Rethinking Legal Criteria for Assessing Compensation for Rural Land Expropriation: Towards a European Institutional Framework

In public management, it is common to face conflicting objectives, particularly in relation land use. Adequate use management requires a valuation of that incorporates the value all its characteristics. That is, addition traditional direct value, must incorporate non-use (existence and legacy), as well indirect option values. The analytic hierarchy process used, firstly, identify priority values based on panel experts, secondly, assessment use/non-use values, using market techniques support. As result, we analyse trade-offs among respondent’s consistency. At first, observed soil with highest protection had lowest terms However, considering weights can conclude only represents 7.6% total value. Non-market represent 92.4% underlying aim facilitate decision-making field increase social welfare resilience landscapes.